May 6, 2008 by PT Rothschild.

WINE AND MUSIC FEST REMARK BEGS EXPLANATION
Temecula, CA – (due to the controversial title, readers, particularly female readers are asked to hold their story judgment until the end.) There comes a time in every man’s life when he reaches the ‘Popeye point’. This moment happened for me yesterday when I read a MSN story, advice actually, by this columnist PhD. A woman had written in and asked if she should let her romantic feelings develop for this charming older gentleman whom she looked up to and who treated her, cared for her like a father figure would? She didn’t think that she could find the same qualities in a man her own age. The woman columnist, after saying that she herself was 16 years older than her male mate and loving it, the ‘cougar’ then told the questioner to blow off the older gentleman and look for someone her own age. I was mortified at the hypocrisy of the advice, partly because I know a scene couple where the ages are 19 and 52. I think they make a great couple, so I considered this advice sour. It wasn’t the first time I’ve seen a ‘cougar’ prance all over the May-December question, pissing on the man’s side while strutting with her tail high in the air on the woman’s side. An article in the column Her Say written for ‘Under The Sun’ several months ago had the same sour tone, but I brushed it off, then. Perhaps to the women (part of some couples I was talking to at the jazz fest on Saturday) I should have qualified my remark by saying some men are like wine, some women are like milk. For that, I apologize. Certainly the three women I danced with during the AWB set weren’t sour at all. But wait, you say, if you read this ‘advice’ on Monday, how could you make your remark on Saturday, two days before? As the valley’s Jedi Master that ‘gift’ was honed in my third year at Yoder University. The course was, ‘How To Be Just Slightly Ahead of Your Time, #324’ taught by a Dr. Panasonic, I believe. As for my scene couple friends, well, she’s 52 and says he treats her ‘better than any man has before and he always thinks of her welfare’; he’s 19 and says ‘she knows how to use what she got’. I’m not sour over that, I think it’s sweet, being the aged wine that I am. But then, I am a Rothschild.

Posted in Commentary | Print | No Comments »

April 7, 2008 by PT Rothschild.

THE CULTURE OF RACISM
A few days ago one of Bill O’Reilly’s long time viewers wrote in that he ‘wasn’t racist but that there was no way in hell that (he) would ever vote a black man in as President of the United States. “It’s not my culture,”’ he went on to say. Bill passed over after reading this to the next viewer’s comments without commenting on this viewer. Why? Because this man’s culture is Bill’s culture, the culture of the ‘white’ power structure, and it is this power structure that Rev. Wright is angry with. What that power structure does is present a certain mindset that has gobbled up many a white mind in its false but crafty (read devilish) logic. Related to me decades ago by Andrew Young before he became a ‘suit’, it goes like this:
‘There was a white sharecropper once in the deep south and the ‘white master’ of the farm had sent his man to tell the white sharecropper of the increase in crops he needed from the sharecropper’s coming harvest. Now the white sharecropper had recently just had his latest baby born and food had been just barely enough for the family before the new arrival. Now with the increased demands the white sharecropper didn’t see how he and his family could make it through the long winter with less than before. An frustration welled up deep inside him so the white sharecropper decided that he would go and see the ‘master’, to work something out. After all, the ‘master’ was a white man like himself so surely when the sharecropper explained his circumstances, the ‘master’ would cut him some slack. His wife and eight kids kissed him good-bye and gave him so oatmeal cookies to share with the master as they sent him off to walk the tree-lined road to the master’s house. When the sharecropper got to the big immaculate house, he was let into the mansion by a well-mannered, nattily attired ‘colored’ butler, who courteously led him to the library and told him the master would be with him shortly. He took the cookies back with him to the master. The sharecropper waited a while, then sat down into a comfy overstuffed chair over by the window. He looked around at all the books that lined the walls and figured the master must be the smartest man in the whole world. Being that smart, surely the master could see how having a healthy, strong well-fed family could help bring in more crops, and maybe he would be given some additional acres as a reward. Perhaps also by having a few extra hands around the farm would be good as they could give the master more help. He would have to bring this up to the master. He sat back and waited. He waited 45 minutes and then the master came in, relaxed, and greeted the sharecropper. The master offered the farmer a glass of brandy as he himself was having, and after first refusing, the sharecropper gave in and accepted a glass from the colored butler. The butler then quietly left the library. The master then explained how he knew the poor man had just had a baby and how they were just barely making ends meet, but the master had needs and obligations also to meet. There was the overseas education of his daughters, his wife did not like wearing the same dress more than once, etc., so the new quotas would have to stand. He was sorry but he knew the sharecropper was resourceful, and maybe one day the newest baby might come and work the garden just outside the kitchen, and not have to work the fields like his brothers? How would the farmer like that? Well the farmer admitted that would be a blessing but then reiterated that his back was against the wall. He couldn’t return home and face his wife as a man unless he could tell her some good news. So the master slumped down into his chair for a minute, then said to the sharecropper, “you know, I can see that I have misjudged this entire situation. Your wife and kids mean as much to you as my household family here does to me. Tell your wife that I am going to re-evaluate everything and come up with an equitable solution we can both live with,” he said most assuredly, carefully pausing his words for maximum effect, then he leaned close to the sharecropper’s ear, as if to impart a secret to someone he now trusted before whispering, “but first I have a problem with some niggers down the road from you to deal with, but just as soon as that’s done, I’ll have a look-see into what I can do for you. Meanwhile I’m gonna have to expect the first harvest as agreed. Alright? Fine.” The sharecropper left the big house, but instead of feeling frustrated, he now felt angry! After all, the master was doing all he could.
This is the Culture of racism. Every succeeding wave of immigrants has felt the ‘we want part of the American Dream too’ but the power structure turned that idea into ‘your dream will come at the expense of mine’ mindset when it comes to black and white in this country, and now to a lesser degree, when it comes to brown and white, read Mexican or illegal immigrant, when really thousands of jobs have been lost to China and India. And most of the working class white society bought into this ‘culture’ and still does. This was one point that Obama raised in his ‘race’ speech and Bill O’Reilly missed, but then, this is the first election in history that you don’t need your ears to listen with, many people will just vote with their eyes. What progress! What a reality check!
End of Part Two – Part Three, The Second Wrong To Make A Wright, (HERE)

Posted in Commentary | Print | No Comments »

March 10, 2008 by PT Rothschild.

A VOTE FOR MCCAIN MEANS MORE OF THE SAME

These United States at this time faces the most perilous time of its history. At a time when bridges are failing or needing repairs, elementary schools are being closed for lack of funds, and people here are being forced out of their homes by high mortgages, the invasion of Iraq, labeled the ‘war in Iraq’ by the neo-liberalism forces and the media outlets they control, will cost all the U.S. citizens a total of $3 Billion dollars a week in 2008. Meanwhile diesel fuel is almost $4 a gallon and gasoline which costs more to produce than diesel, is following close behind at almost $4. For the record, a gallon of gas cost about 5¢ to produce so diesel probably comes in at about 3¢.
The recent decline of fighting in Iraq comes from paying thousands of people millions of dollars a month NOT to fight. And you thought only Democrats threw money at a problem. Woe that this fiscal irresponsibility was limited to only Washington D.C. but it isn’t. After feasting $87K on a study for the Youth Master Plan and another $170K on a decorative wall plaque to discourage teen graffiti which has never been a problem in Barbie-land, and ignoring all the signs (and posts here about the recession coming), the Temecula City Council has announced they are facing a famine. Will they, like everyone else, purport to say the only way out is to raise some tax to offset what they need?
Here’s an idea and a question. Why should everyday taxpayers stand for another tax increase which would mean more money for city coffers when the money they had was so mismanaged by people with no foresight? How about the city and state politicians and bureaucrats taking a 15% pay cut to help balance the budget? Since many in government have access to more than one insurance plan (including the spouse’s), how about them giving up one of the plans, to save government dollars? Recently when the school administrators here said they would be willing give up several days of their payroll to help balance the budget so two elementary schools wouldn’t have to close, the teachers who were asked to make the same sacrifice said ‘no’. They would rather have the teacher layoffs (teachers who have less seniority than them) and see the schools closed than give up three days pay.
Hopefully this next election, both city, state, and federal, will show the voters’ desire to replace ‘them’ incumbents with more ‘us’ neophyte politicians that are kid-music friendly and have all the constituents in mind, and not just their friends. We live in hope.

Posted in Commentary, News | Print | No Comments »

March 3, 2008 by PT Rothschild.

WHAT CAN HAPPEN WHEN BAD GIRLS GO GOOD

Inland Empire, CA – Most people who hear me talk of the ‘scene’ think that it means music shows, but the scene really applies to the people who inhabit the scene around the music shows. The synergy supplied by these various characters intermingling and exchanging ideas, experiences, and knowledge is really what having a ‘scene’ is all about. Take the strange case of one of the most extraordinary beings ever to grace the scene, the Sex Pixi.


A husband with an eight month pregnant wife, who hasn’t had sex with her almost since conception, ran into the Sex Pixi not long ago. After one of the Sex Pixi’s unique therapy sessions, the husband awoke the next morning with his camel-hump wife humping him as his awareness flooded in to his wakening mind. The one night the Sex Pixi had granted them put the ‘X’ back in their sex life. The husband shouted out to the world, “Tell everyone! We’re proud of having spent quality time with the Sex Pixi. She’s awesome!”

An ex-hippie guitarist turned community pillar has a wife who has gained seven pounds a year since marriage. Returning to play shows in the scene now that the kids are up and gone, the chubby chaser stopped to remiss to the Sex Pixi one night by a Jacuzzi that his wife was harder to start than a model T Ford in a 1910 Iowa blizzard. By the time his wife had warmed up he was crying ‘L.S.M.F.T.’ and this wasn’t asking for a Lucky Strike either. The next day after a Sex Pixi session of verbal counseling, he was ‘leaving on a jet plane, don’t know when I’ll be back again’ to visit his out-of-state spouse and ‘burn the water brown’, another happy Sex Pixi alumni.

Now, you may ask yourself, gentle reader, just how I became aware of these stories. Well, the Sex Pixi has counseled me too, and now I know what particular fetish lies behind the closed doors of my mind. At last I recognize part of what makes me tick, all thanks to the scene’s under-the-radar unpaid sex worker, the Sex Pixi.

Posted in Commentary | Print | No Comments »

February 21, 2008 by PT Rothschild.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP ATTEMPT ON CAPITAL HILL
(ED NOTE: this article is deemed important enough to be re-printed for your edification and protection.)
Washington, DC – Once again the feds are trying to stifle a basic freedom. After legislating away the fundamental right of habeas corpus, the Empire is now trying to take away you right to free speech, in a whisper. Now you know where this sort of idea is coming from. There is a rise of the type of people who think they should run your lives and compel you to their standards, though those standards don’t represent you, and not just locally over a play. However, in a country where freedom still exists, nothing happens in a vacuum, so here, my dear readers, is the downlow on the smackdown.
Senate bill S 1959 “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007″ must be stopped at all costs. If this bill is passed, and becomes law, your words and actions could be considered terrorism. S 1959 EVISCERATES FREE SPEECH, and empowers the govt. to declare ANYTHING they deem an “extremist belief system”, instantly make you a terrorist, resulting in stripping of US citizenship, torture, and/or execution, with no habeas corpus rights, no ability to challenge even in the US Supreme Court. If this becomes law, your words could be considered “promoting an extremist belief system”, and all they have to say is that you are using PLANNED OR THREATENED *FORCE* (DOES NOT HAVE TO BE VIOLENCE) –FORCE by exposing CORRUPTION, CRIMINALITY against “THE CIVILIAN POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES, *****OR ANY SEGMENT THEREOF” READ THE BILL MANY TIMES AND VERY CAREFULLY–YOU ARE THE TERRORIST (WHICH MEANS THEY CAN STRIP YOUR CITIZENSHIP, AND HAVE YOU TORTURED AND EXECUTED). Contact your Senator and let them know they will be looking for another job if they vote yes on this bill, which is now introduced into the Senate as S.1959 THIS BILL **MUST NOT** BECOME LAW, PERIOD. To contact your senator, http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm .
To read the full bill, go here: http://tinyurl.com/3a3y2z.
And to track the progress of the bill, http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-1955 &
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-1959
This has been brought to you as a public service of this e-zine and by those who value being an American.

Posted in News | Print | 1 Comment »

December 17, 2007 by PT Rothschild.

NO LUMP OF COAL FOR T-TOWN BUSINESS BEDFELLOW

Temecula, CA – As business after small business shuts down here in T-town, and homeowner after homeowner just walks away from the home they hoped would one day leverage them into a higher tax bracket, Al Rattan’s favorite group of big spenders, the T-town city council, made one blacksmith’s Christmas bright. Budgeted at $180,000, the city council paid out the large sum for the ‘wall hanging’ that graces one side of the Overland Overpass.


Long hailed as idiotic by the hoi polloi, the idea of hanging anything over the side of an overpass, illegal by the Highway Patrol but OK by the city, was always one boondoggle that seemed to be half-baked at best. Kept off the front burner in the main stream (local) media, the grumbling which started when the sculpture was first viewed, and only grew louder when the price tag was once again exposed to the public, who paid for what has lovingly been called a ‘turd salad’. When you think about the fact that on a good year, the TVIFF (Temecula Valley International Film and Music Festival) only gets $30K to host it’s gala week long affair and the city just spent $87K for a report about the Youth Master Plan (not the master plan itself), it’s easy to see just where Big AL is getting his ‘political bedfellows cut up T-town pie for themselves’ talk to tell the Rescue Temecula townsfolk.

In all honesty, you would think that all that money could have been used to help keep some of the small business open during this recession as well as stock some food pantries for the fire and layoff victims instead of buying a blacksmith a bigger bass boat. Still one wonders if all those kind Murr-ville city hall folk who drained Cuppy’s Coffee cup are aware that the T-town city council is poised to take a bite out of Murrieta by glomming up French Valley and their 48,000 home tax base, including it in the land the T-town city council is annexing. Bet you thought only the Quarry land was up for grabs. Forty-eight thousand homes with families is not ‘chicken feed’ for the T-town forces.

Another formula shows that a total of 45 special use permits (@ $4000 apiece) allowing places like The Vault to operate and give the myriad groups of teens someplace to listen to their music, could have been made available as interest free loans or grants for the same tax dollar amount, had the powers that be had any interest in serving the total populace.

Posted in Commentary, News | Print | No Comments »

August 9, 2007 by PT Rothschild.

A CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

by D.L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
Arranged and Edited by John Loeffler

In the mainline media, those who adhere to the position that there is some kind of “conspiracy” pushing us towards a world government are virulently ridiculed. The standard attack maintains that the so-called “New World Order” is the product of turn-of-the-century, right-wing, bigoted, anti-Semitic racists acting in the tradition of the long-debunked Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, now promulgated by some Militias and other right-wing hate groups. The historical record does not support that position to any large degree but it has become the mantra of the socialist left and their cronies, the media.
The term “New World Order” has been used thousands of times in this century by proponents in high places of federalized world government. Some of those involved in this collaboration to achieve world order have been Jewish. The preponderance are not, so it most definitely is not a Jewish agenda.


For years, leaders in education, industry, the media, banking, etc., have promoted those with the same Weltanschauung (world view) as theirs. Of course, someone might say that just because individuals promote their friends doesn’t constitute a conspiracy. That’s true in the usual sense. However, it does represent an “open conspiracy,” as described by noted Fabian Socialist H.G. Wells in The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution (1928).
In 1913, prior to the passage of the Federal Reserve Act President Wilson’s The New Freedom was published, in which he revealed: “Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U. S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
On November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote a letter to Col. Edward Mandell House, President Woodrow Wilson’s close advisor: “The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson… ”
That there is such a thing as a cabal of power brokers who control government behind the scenes has been detailed several times in this century by credible sources. Professor Carroll Quigley was Bill Clinton’s mentor at Georgetown University. President Clinton has publicly paid homage to the influence Professor Quigley had on his life. In Quigley’s magnum opus Tragedy and Hope (1966), he states: “There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international … network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies… but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”
Even talk show host Rush Limbaugh, an outspoken critic of anyone claiming a push for global government, said on his February 7, 1995 program: “You see, if you amount to anything in Washington these days, it is because you have been plucked or handpicked from an Ivy League school — Harvard, Yale, Kennedy School of Government — you’ve shown an aptitude to be a good Ivy League type, and so you’re plucked so-to-speak, and you are assigned success. You are assigned a certain role in government somewhere, and then your success is monitored and tracked, and you go where the pluckers and the hand-pickers can put you.”
On May 4, 1993, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) president Leslie Gelb said on The Charlie Rose Show that: “… you [Charlie Rose] had me ..] to talk about the New World Order! I talk about it all the time. It’s one world now. The Council [CFR] can find, nurture, and begin to put people in the kinds of jobs this country needs. And that’s going to be one of the major enterprises of the Council under me.”
Previous CFR chairman, John J. McCloy (1953-70), actually said they have been doing this since the 1940s (and before).
The thrust towards global government can be well-documented but at the end of the twentieth century it does not look like a traditional conspiracy in the usual sense of a secret cabal of evil men meeting clandestinely behind closed doors. Rather, it is a “networking” of like-minded individuals in high places to achieve a common goal, as described in Marilyn Ferguson’s 1980 insider classic, The Aquarian Conspiracy.
Perhaps the best way to relate this would be a brief history of the New World Order, not in our words but in the words of those who have been striving to make it real.

1912 — Colonel Edward M. House, a close advisor of President Woodrow Wilson, publishes Phillip Dru: Administrator in which he promotes “socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx.”
1913 — The Federal Reserve (neither federal nor a reserve) is created. It was planned at a secret meeting in 1910 on Jekyl Island, Georgia by a group of bankers and politicians, including Col. House. This transferred the power to create money from the American government to a private group of bankers. It is probably the largest generator of debt in the world.
May 30, 1919 — Prominent British and American personalities establish the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England and the Institute of International Affairs in the U.S. at a meeting arranged by Col. House attended by various Fabian socialists, including noted economist John Maynard Keynes. Two years later, Col. House reorganizes the Institute of International Affairs into the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
December 15, 1922 — The CFR endorses World Government in its magazine Foreign Affairs. Author Philip Kerr, states: “Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind as long as [the earth] remains divided into 50 or 60 independent states until some kind of international system is created… The real problem today is that of the world government.”
1928 — The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution by H.G. Wells is published. A former Fabian Socialist, Wells writes: “The political world of the … Open Conspiracy must weaken, efface, incorporate and supersede existing governments… The Open Conspiracy is the natural inheritor of socialist and communist enthusiasms; it may be in control of Moscow before it is in control of New York… The character of the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly displayed… It will be a world religion.”
1931 — Students at the Lenin School of Political Warfare in Moscow are taught: “One day we shall start to spread the most theatrical peace movement the world has ever seen. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent … will fall into the trap offered by the possibility of making new friends. Our day will come in 30 years or so… The bourgeoisie must be lulled into a false sense of security.”
1931 — In a speech to the Institute for the Study of International Affairs at Copenhagen) historian Arnold Toyee said: “We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands….”
1932 — New books are published urging World Order: Toward Soviet America by William Z. Foster. Head of the Communist Party USA, Foster indicates that a National Department of Education would be one of the means used to develop a new socialist society in the U.S. The New World Order by F.S. Marvin, describing the League of Nations as the first attempt at a New World Order. Marvin says, “nationality must rank below the claims of mankind as a whole.”
Dare the School Build a New Social Order? is published. Educator author George Counts asserts that: “… the teachers should deliberately reach for power and then make the most of their conquest” in order to “influence the social attitudes, ideals and behavior of the coming generation… The growth of science and technology has carried us into a new age where ignorance must be replaced by knowledge, competition by cooperation, trust in Providence by careful planning and private capitalism by some form of social economy.”
1933 — The first Humanist Manifesto is published. Co-author John Dewey, the noted philosopher and educator, calls for a synthesizing of all religions and “a socialized and cooperative economic order.” Co-signer C.F. Potter said in 1930: “Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and every American public school is a school of humanism. What can the theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week, teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic teaching?”
1933 — The Shape of Things to Come by H.G. Wells is published. Wells predicts a second world war around 1940, originating from a German-Polish dispute. After 1945 there would be an increasing lack of public safety in “criminally infected” areas. The plan for the “Modern World-State” would succeed on its third attempt (about 1980), and come out of something that occurred in Basra, Iraq. The book also states, “Although world government had been plainly coming for some years, although it had been endlessly feared and murmured against, it found no opposition prepared anywhere.”
1934 — The Externalization of the Hierarchy by Alice A. Bailey is published. Bailey is an occultist, whose works are channeled from a spirit guide, the Tibetan Master [demon spirit] Djwahl Kuhl. Bailey uses the phrase “points of light” in connection with a “New Group of World Servers” and claims that 1934 marks the beginning of “the organizing of the men and women… group work of a new order… [with] progress defined by service… the world of the Brotherhood… the Forces of Light… [and] out of the spoliation of all existing culture and civilization, the new world order must be built.”
The book is published by the Lucis Trust, incorporated originally in New York as the Lucifer Publishing Company. Lucis Trust is a United Nations NGO and has been a major player at the recent U.N. summits. Later Assistant Secretary General of the U.N. Robert Mueller would credit the creation of his World Core Curriculum for education to the underlying teachings of Djwahl Kuhl via Alice Bailey’s writings on the subject.
1932 — Plan for Peace by American Birth Control League founder Margaret Sanger (1921) is published. She calls for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative concentration camps for all “dysgenic stocks” including Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics.
October 28, 1939 — In an address by John Foster Dulles, later U.S. Secretary of State, he proposes that America lead the transition to a new order of less independent, semi-sovereign states bound together by a league or federal union.
1939 — New World Order by H. G. Wells proposes a collectivist one-world state”‘ or “new world order” comprised of “socialist democracies.” He advocates “universal conscription for service” and declares that “nationalist individualism… is the world’s disease.” He continues: “The manifest necessity for some collective world control to eliminate warfare and the less generally admitted necessity for a collective control of the economic and biological life of mankind, are aspects of one and the same process.” He proposes that this be accomplished through “universal law” and propaganda (or education).”
1940 — The New World Order is published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and contains a select list of references on regional and world federation, together with some special plans for world order after the war.
December 12, 1940 — In The Congressional Record an article entitled A New World Order John G. Alexander calls for a world federation.
1942 — The leftist Institute of Pacific Relations publishes Post War Worlds by P.E. Corbett: “World government is the ultimate aim… It must be recognized that the law of nations takes precedence over national law… The process will have to be assisted by the deletion of the nationalistic material employed in educational textbooks and its replacement by material explaining the benefits of wiser association.”
June 28, 1945 — President Truman endorses world government in a speech: “It will be just as easy for nations to get along in a republic of the world as it is for us to get along in a republic of the United States.”
October 24, 1945 — The United Nations Charter becomes effective. Also on October 24, Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho) introduces Senate Resolution 183 calling upon the U.S. Senate to go on record as favoring creation of a world republic including an international police force.
1946 — Alger Hiss is elected President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Hiss holds this office until 1949. Early in 1950, he is convicted of perjury and sentenced to prison after a sensational trial and Congressional hearing in which Whittaker Chambers, a former senior editor of Time, testifies that Hiss was a member of his Communist Party cell.
1946 — The Teacher and World Government by former editor of the NEA Journal (National Education Association) Joy Elmer Morgan is published. He says: “In the struggle to establish an adequate world government, the teacher… can do much to prepare the hearts and minds of children for global understanding and cooperation… At the very heart of all the agencies which will assure the coming of world government must stand the school, the teacher, and the organized profession.”
1947 — The American Education Fellowship, formerly the Progressive Education Association, organized by John Dewey, calls for the: “… establishment of a genuine world order, an order in which national sovereignty is subordinate to world authority… ”
October, 1947 — NEA Associate Secretary William Carr writes in the NEA Journal that teachers should: “… teach about the various proposals that have been made for the strengthening of the United Nations and the establishment of a world citizenship and world government.”
1948 — Walden II by behavioral psychologist B.F. Skinner proposes “a perfect society or new and more perfect order” in which children are reared by the State, rather than by their parents and are trained from birth to demonstrate only desirable behavior and characteristics. Skinner’s ideas would be widely implemented by educators in the 1960s, 70s, and 80s as Values Clarification and Outcome Based Education.
July, 1948 — Britain’s Sir Harold Butler, in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs, sees “a New World Order” taking shape: “How far can the life of nations, which for centuries have thought of themselves as distinct and unique, be merged with the life of other nations? How far are they prepared to sacrifice a part of their sovereignty without which there can be no effective economic or political union?… Out of the prevailing confusion a new world is taking shape… which may point the way toward the new order… That will be the beginning of a real United Nations, no longer crippled by a split personality, but held together by a common faith.”
1948 — UNESCO president and Fabian Socialist, Sir Julian Huxley, calls for a radical eugenic policy in UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. He states: “Thus, even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy of controlled human breeding will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
1948 — The preliminary draft of a World Constitution is published by U.S. educators advocating regional federation on the way toward world federation or government with England incorporated into a European federation. The Constitution provides for a “World Council” along with a “Chamber of Guardians” to enforce world law. Also included is a “Preamble” calling upon nations to surrender their arms to the world government, and includes the right of this “Federal Republic of the World” to seize private property for federal use.
February 9, 1950 — The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduces Senate Concurrent Resolution 66 which begins: “Whereas, in order to achieve universal peace and justice, the present Charter of the United Nations should be changed to provide a true world government constitution.”
The resolution was first introduced in the Senate on September 13, 1949 by Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho). Senator Alexander Wiley (R-Wisconsin) called it “a consummation devoutly to be wished for” and said, “I understand your proposition is either change the United Nations, or change or create, by a separate convention, a world order.” Senator Taylor later stated: “We would have to sacrifice considerable sovereignty to the world organization to enable them to levy taxes in their own right to support themselves.”
1950 — In testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, international financier James P Warburg said: “we shall have a world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”
April 12, 1952 — John Foster Dulles, later to become Secretary of State, says in a speech to the American Bar Association in Louisville, Kentucky, that “treaty laws can override the Constitution.” He says treaties can take power away from Congress and give them to the President. They can take powers from the States and give them to the Federal Government or to some international body and they can cut across the rights given to the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights. A Senate amendment, proposed by GOP Senator John Bricker, would have provided that no treaty could supersede the Constitution, but it fails to pass by one vote.
1954 — Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands establishes the Bilderbergers, international politicians and bankers who meet secretly on an annual basis.
1954 — H. Rowan Gaither, Jr., President - Ford Foundation said to Norman Dodd of the Congressional Reese Commission: “… all of us here at the policy-making level have had experience with directives… from the White House…  The substance of them is that we shall use our grant-making power so as to alter our life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”
1954 — Senator William Jenner said: “Today the path to total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people… outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded and is sure that it is the winning side…. All the strange developments in the foreign policy agreements may be traced to this group who are going to make us over to suit their pleasure…. This political action group has its own local political support organizations, its own pressure groups, its own vested interests, its foothold within our government, and its own propaganda apparatus.”
1958 — World Peace through World Law is published, where authors Grenville Clark and Louis Sohn advocate using the U.N. as a governing body for the world, world disarmament, a world police force and legislature.
1959 — The Council on Foreign Relations calls for a New International Order Study Number 7, issued on November 25, advocated: “… new international order [which] must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, for social and economic change… an international order… including states labeling themselves as ’socialist’ [communist].”
1959 — The World Constitution and Parliament Association is founded which later develops a Diagram of World Government under the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.
1959 — The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy is published, sponsored by the Rockefeller Brothers’ Fund. It explains that the U.S.: “… cannot escape, and indeed should welcome… the task which history has imposed on us. This is the task of helping to shape a new world order in all its dimensions — spiritual, economic, political, social.”
September 9, 1960 — President Eisenhower signs Senate Joint Resolution 170, promoting the concept of a federal Atlantic Union. Pollster and Atlantic Union Committee treasurer, Elmo Roper, later delivers an address titled, The Goal Is Government of All the World, in which he states: “For it becomes clear that the first step toward World Government cannot be completed until we have advanced on the four fronts: the economic, the military, the political and the social.”
1961 — The U.S. State Department issues a plan to disarm all nations and arm the United Nations. State Department Document Number 7277 is entitled Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations and arm the U.N. with the final stage in which “no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force.”
March 1, 1962 — Sen. Clark speaking on the floor of the Senate about PL 87-297 which calls for the disbanding of all armed forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form whatsoever. “… This program is the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government of the United States.”
1962 — New Calls for World Federalism. In a study titled, A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations, CFR member Lincoln Bloomfield states: “… if the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government.”
The Future of Federalism by author Nelson Rockefeller is published. The one-time Governor of New York, claims that current events compellingly demand a “new world order,” as the old order is crumbling, and there is “a new and free order struggling to be born.” Rockefeller says there is: “a fever of nationalism… [but] the nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political tasks….These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order… [with] voluntary service… and our dedicated faith in the brotherhood of all mankind…. Sooner perhaps than we may realize… there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world.”
1963 — J. William Fulbright, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee speaks at a symposium sponsored by the Fund for the Republic, a left-wing project of the Ford Foundation: “The case for government by elites is irrefutable… government by the people is possible but highly improbable.”

1964 — Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook II is published. Author Benjamin Bloom states: “… a large part of what we call ‘good teaching’ is the teacher’s ability to attain affective objectives through challenging the students’ fixed beliefs.”
His Outcome-Based Education (OBE) method of teaching would first be tried as Mastery Learning in Chicago schools. After five years, Chicago students’ test scores had plummeted causing outrage among parents. OBE would leave a trail of wreckage wherever it would be tried and under whatever name it would be used. At the same time, it would become crucial to globalists for overhauling the education system to promote attitude changes among school students.
1964 — Visions of Order by Richard Weaver is published. He describes: “progressive educators as a ‘revolutionary cabal’ engaged in ‘a systematic attempt to undermine society’s traditions and beliefs.”
1967 — Richard Nixon calls for New World Order. In Asia after Vietnam, in the October issue of Foreign Affairs, Nixon writes of nations’ dispositions to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a “new world order.”
1968 — Joy Elmer Morgan, former editor of the NEA Journal publishes The American Citizens Handbook in which he says: “the coming of the United Nations and the urgent necessity that it evolve into a more comprehensive form of world government places upon the citizens of the United States an increased obligation to make the most of their citizenship which now widens into active world citizenship.”
July 26, 1968 — Nelson Rockefeller pledges support of the New World Order. In an Associated Press report, Rockefeller pledges that, “as President, he would work toward international creation of a new world order.”
1970 — Education and the mass media promote world order. In Thinking About A New World Order for the Decade 1990, author Ian Baldwin, Jr. asserts that: “… the World Law Fund has begun a worldwide research and educational program that will introduce a new, emerging discipline — world order — into educational curricula throughout the world… and to concentrate some of its energies on bringing basic world order concepts into the mass media again on a worldwide level.”
1972 — President Nixon visits China. In his toast to Chinese Premier Chou En-lai, former CFR member and now President, Richard Nixon, expresses “the hope that each of us has to build a new world order.”
May 18, 1972 — In speaking of the coming of world government, Roy M. Ash, director of the Office of Management and Budget, declares that: “within two decades the institutional framework for a world economic community will be in place… [and] aspects of individual sovereignty will be given over to a super-national authority.”
1973 — The Trilateral Commission is established. Banker David Rockefeller organizes this new private body and chooses Zbigniew Brzezinski, later National Security Advisor to President Carter, as the Commission’s first director and invites Jimmy Carter to become a founding member.
1973 — Humanist Manifesto II is published: “The next century can be and should be the humanistic century… we stand at the dawn of a new age… a secular society on a planetary scale…. As non-theists we begin with humans not God, nature not deity… we deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds…. Thus we look to the development of a system of world law and a world order based upon transnational federal government…. The true revolution is occurring.”
April, 1974 — Former U. S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Trilateralist and CFR member Richard Gardner’s article The Hard Road to World Order is published in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs where he states that: “the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down… but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
1974 — The World Conference of Religion for Peace, held in Louvain, Belgium is held. Douglas Roche presents a report entitled We Can Achieve a New World Order. The U.N. calls for wealth redistribution: In a report entitled New International Economic Order, the U.N. General Assembly outlines a plan to redistribute the wealth from the rich to the poor nations.
1975 — A study titled, A New World Order, is published by the Center of International Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Studies, Princeton University.
1975 — In Congress, 32 Senators and 92 Representatives sign A Declaration of Interdependence, written by historian Henry Steele Commager. The Declaration states that: “we must join with others to bring forth a new world order… Narrow notions of national sovereignty must not be permitted to curtail that obligation.”
Congresswoman Marjorie Holt refuses to sign the Declaration saying: “It calls for the surrender of our national sovereignty to international organizations. It declares that our economy should be regulated by international authorities. It proposes that we enter a ‘new world order’ that would redistribute the wealth created by the American people.”
1975 — Retired Navy Admiral Chester Ward, former Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy and former CFR member, writes in a critique that the goal of the CFR is the “submergence of U. S. sovereignty and national independence into an all powerful one-world government… ”
1975 — Kissinger on the Couch is published. Authors Phyllis Schlafly and former CFR member Chester Ward state: “Once the ruling members of the CFR have decided that the U.S. government should espouse a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of the CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy and to confound, discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition… ”
1976 — RIO: Reshaping the International Order is published by the globalist Club of Rome, calling for a new international order, including an economic redistribution of wealth.
1977 — The Third Try at World Order is published. Author Harlan Cleveland of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies calls for: “changing Americans’ attitudes and institutions” for “complete disarmament (except for international soldiers)” and “for individual entitlement to food, health and education.”
1977 — Imperial Brain Trust by Laurence Shoup and William Minter is published. The book takes a critical look at the Council on Foreign Relations with chapters such as: Shaping a New World Order: The Council’s Blueprint for Global Hegemony, 1939-1944 and Toward the 1980’s: The Council’s Plans for a New World Order.
1977 — The Trilateral Connection appears in the July edition of Atlantic Monthly. Written by Jeremiah Novak, it says: “For the third time in this century, a group of American schools, businessmen, and government officials is planning to fashion a New World Order… ”
1977 — Leading educator Mortimer Adler publishes Philosopher at Large in which he says: “… if local civil government is necessary for local civil peace, then world civil government is necessary for world peace.”
1979 — Barry Goldwater, retiring Republican Senator from Arizona, publishes his autobiography With No Apologies. He writes: “In my view The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power — political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the interest of creating a more peaceful, more productive world community. What the Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the future.”
1984 — The Power to Lead is published. Author James McGregor Burns admits: “The framers of the U.S. constitution have simply been too shrewd for us. The have outwitted us. They designed separate institutions that cannot be unified by mechanical linkages, frail bridges, tinkering. If we are to ‘turn the Founders upside down’ — we must directly confront the constitutional structure they erected.”
1985 — Norman Cousins, the honorary chairman of Planetary Citizens for the World We Chose, is quoted in Human Events: “World government is coming, in fact, it is inevitable. No arguments for or against it can change that fact.”
Cousins was also president of the World Federalist Association, an affiliate of the World Association for World Federation (WAWF), headquartered in Amsterdam. WAWF is a leading force for world federal government and is accredited by the U.N. as a Non-Governmental Organization.
1987 — The Secret Constitution and the Need for Constitutional Change is sponsored in part by the Rockefeller Foundation. Some thoughts of author Arthur S. Miller are:
“… a pervasive system of thought control exists in the United States… the citizenry is indoctrinated by employment of the mass media and the system of public education… people are told what to think about… the old order is crumbling… Nationalism should be seen as a dangerous social disease… A new vision is required to plan and manage the future, a global vision that will transcend national boundaries and eliminate the poison of nationalistic solutions… a new Constitution is necessary.”
1988 — Former Under-secretary of State and CFR member George Ball in a January 24 interview in the New York Times says: “The Cold War should no longer be the kind of obsessive concern that it is. Neither side is going to attack the other deliberately… If we could internationalize by using the U.N. in conjunction with the Soviet Union, because we now no longer have to fear, in most cases, a Soviet veto, then we could begin to transform the shape of the world and might get the U.N. back to doing something useful… Sooner or later we are going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that they are not confined merely to the nation-states. Start first on a regional and ultimately you could move to a world basis.”
December 7, 1988 — In an address to the U.N., Mikhail Gorbachev calls for mutual consensus: “World progress is only possible through a search for universal human consensus as we move forward to a new world order.”
May 12, 1989 — President Bush invites the Soviets to join World Order. Speaking to the graduating class at Texas A&M University, Mr. Bush states that the United States is ready to welcome the Soviet Union “back into the world order.”
1989 — Carl Bernstein’s (Woodward and Bernstein of Watergate fame) book Loyalties: A Son’s Memoir is published. His father and mother had been members of the Communist party. Bernstein’s father tells his son about the book: “You’re going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right… I’m worried about the kind of book you’re going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you’re saying he was right… I agree that the Party was a force in the country.”
1990 — The World Federalist Association faults the American press. Writing in their Summer/Fall newsletter, Deputy Director Eric Cox describes world events over the past year or two and declares: “It’s sad but true that the slow-witted American press has not grasped the significance of most of these developments. But most federalists know what is happening… And they are not frightened by the old bug-a-boo of sovereignty.”

September 11, 1990 — President Bush calls the Gulf War an opportunity for the New World Order. In an address to Congress entitled Toward a New World Order, Mr. Bush says: “The crisis in the Persian Gulf offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times… a new world order can emerge in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony…. Today the new world is struggling to be born.”
September 25, 1990 — In an address to the U.N., Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze describes Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait as “an act of terrorism [that] has been perpetrated against the emerging New World Order.” On December 31, Gorbachev declares that the New World Order would be ushered in by the Gulf Crisis.
October 1, 1990 — In a U.N. address, President Bush speaks of the: “… collective strength of the world community expressed by the U.N. … an historic movement towards a new world order… a new partnership of nations… a time when humankind came into its own… to bring about a revolution of the spirit and the mind and begin a journey into a… new age.”
1991 — Author Linda MacRae-Campbell publishes How to Start a Revolution at Your School in the publication In Context. She promotes the use of “change agents” as “self-acknowledged revolutionaries” and “co-conspirators.”
1991 — President Bush praises the New World Order in a State of Union Message:
“What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea — a new world order… to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind… based on shared principles and the rule of law…. The illumination of a thousand points of light…. The winds of change are with us now.”
February 6, 1991 — President Bush tells the Economic Club of New York: “My vision of a new world order foresees a United Nations with a revitalized peacekeeping function.”
June, 1991 — The Council on Foreign Relations co-sponsors an assembly Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order which is attended by 65 prestigious members of government, labor, academia, the media, military, and the professions from nine countries. Later, several of the conference participants joined some 100 other world leaders for another closed door meeting of the Bilderberg Society in Baden Baden, Germany. The Bilderbergers also exert considerable clout in determining the foreign policies of their respective governments. While at that meeting, David Rockefeller said in a speech: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
July, 1991 — The Southeastern World Affairs Institute discusses the New World Order. In a program, topics include, Legal Structures for a New World Order and The United Nations: From its Conception to a New World Order. Participants include a former director of the U.N.’s General Legal Division, and a former Secretary General of International Planned Parenthood.
Late July, 1991 — On a Cable News Network program, CFR member and former CIA director Stansfield Turner (Rhodes scholar), when asked about Iraq, responded:
“We have a much bigger objective. We’ve got to look at the long run here. This is an example — the situation between the United Nations and Iraq — where the United Nations is deliberately intruding into the sovereignty of a sovereign nation… Now this is a marvelous precedent (to be used in) all countries of the world… ”

October 29, 1991 — David Funderburk, former U. S. Ambassador to Romania, tells a North Carolina audience: “George Bush has been surrounding himself with people who believe in one-world government. They believe that the Soviet system and the American system are converging.” The vehicle to bring this about, said Funderburk, is the United Nations, “the majority of whose 166 member states are socialist, atheist, and anti-American.” Funderburk served as ambassador in Bucharest from 1981 to 1985, when he resigned in frustration over U.S. support of the oppressive regime of the late Rumanian dictator, Nicolae Ceausescu.
October 30, 1991: — President Gorbachev at the Middle East Peace Talks in Madrid states: “We are beginning to see practical support. And this is a very significant sign of the movement towards a new era, a new age… We see both in our country and elsewhere… ghosts of the old thinking… When we rid ourselves of their presence, we will be better able to move toward a new world order… relying on the relevant mechanisms of the United Nations.”
Elsewhere, in Alexandria, Virginia, Elena Lenskaya, Counsellor to the Minister of Education of Russia, delivers the keynote address for a program titled, Education for a New World Order.
1992 — The Twilight of Sovereignty by CFR member (and former Citicorp Chairman) Walter Wriston is published, in which he claims: “A truly global economy will require … compromises of national sovereignty… There is no escaping the system.”
1992 — The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) Earth Summit takes place in Rio de Janeiro this year, headed by Conference Secretary-General Maurice Strong. The main products of this summit are the Biodiversity Treaty and Agenda 21, which the U.S. hesitates to sign because of opposition at home due to the threat to sovereignty and economics. The summit says the first world’s wealth must be transferred to the third world.
July 20, 1992 — Time magazine publishes The Birth of the Global Nation by Strobe Talbott, Rhodes Scholar, roommate of Bill Clinton at Oxford University, CFR Director, and Trilateralist, in which he writes: “All countries are basically social arrangements… No matter how permanent or even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary… Perhaps national sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all… But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for world government.”
As an editor of Time, Talbott defended Clinton during his presidential campaign. He was appointed by President Clinton as the number two person at the State Department behind Secretary of State Warren Christopher, former Trilateralist and former CFR Vice-Chairman and Director. Talbott was confirmed by about two-thirds of the U.S. Senate despite his statement about the unimportance of national sovereignty.
September 29, 1992 — At a town hall meeting in Los Angeles, Trilateralist and former CFR president Winston Lord delivers a speech titled Changing Our Ways: America and the New World, in which he remarks: “To a certain extent, we are going to have to yield some of our sovereignty, which will be controversial at home… [Under] the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)… some Americans are going to be hurt as low-wage jobs are taken away.” Lord became an Assistant Secretary of State in the Clinton administration.
1992 — President Bush addressing the General Assembly of the U.N said: “It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.”
Winter, 1992-93 — The CFR’s Foreign Affairs publishes Empowering the United Nations by U.N. Secretary General Boutros-Boutros Ghali, who asserts:
“It is undeniable that the centuries-old doctrine of absolute and exclusive sovereignty no longer stands… Underlying the rights of the individual and the rights of peoples is a dimension of universal sovereignty that resides in all humanity… It is a sense that increasingly finds expression in the gradual expansion of international law… In this setting the significance of the United Nations should be evident and accepted.”
1993 — Strobe Talbott receives the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award for his 1992 Time article, The Birth of the Global Nation and in appreciation for what he has done “for the cause of global governance.” President Clinton writes a letter of congratulation which states: “Norman Cousins worked for world peace and world government…. Strobe Talbott’s lifetime achievements as a voice for global harmony have earned him this recognition… He will be a worthy recipient of the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award. Best wishes… for future success.” Not only does President Clinton use the specific term, “world government,” but he also expressly wishes the WFA “future success” in pursuing world federal government. Talbott proudly accepts the award, but says the WFA should have given it to the other nominee, Mikhail Gorbachev.
July 18, 1993 — CFR member and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in the Los Angeles Times concerning NAFTA: “What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system… a first step toward a new world order.”
August 23, 1993 — Christopher Hitchens, Socialist friend of Bill Clinton when he was at Oxford University, says in a C-SPAN interview: “… it is, of course the case that there is a ruling class in this country, and that it has allies internationally.”
October 30, 1993 — Washington Post ombudsman Richard Harwood does an op-ed piece about the role of the CFR’s media members: “Their membership is an acknowledgment of their ascension into the American ruling class [where] they do not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy for the United States; they help make it.”
January/February, 1994 — The CFR’s Foreign Affairs prints an opening article by CFR Senior Fellow Michael Clough in which he writes that the “Wise Men” (e.g. Paul Nitze, Dean Acheson, George Kennan, and John J. McCloy) have: “assiduously guarded it [American foreign policy] for the past 50 years… They ascended to power during World War II… This was as it should be. National security and the national interest, they argued must transcend the special interests and passions of the people who make up America… How was this small band of Atlantic-minded internationalists able to triumph … Eastern internationalists were able to shape and staff the burgeoning foreign policy institutions… As long as the Cold War endured and nuclear Armageddon seemed only a missile away, the public was willing to tolerate such an undemocratic foreign policy making system.”
1994 — In the Human Development Report, published by the UN Development Program, there was a section called “Global Governance For the 21st Century”. The administrator for this program was appointed by Bill Clinton. His name is James Gustave Speth. The opening sentence of the report said: “Mankind’s problems can no longer be solved by national government. What is needed is a World Government. This can best be achieved by strengthening the United Nations system.”
1995 — The State of the World Forum took place in the fall of this year, sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation located at the Presidio in San Francisco. Foundation President Jim Garrison chairs the meeting of who’s-who from around the world including Margaret Thatcher, Maurice Strong, George Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev and others. Conversation centers around the oneness of mankind and the coming global government. However, the term “global governance” is now used in place of “new world order” since the latter has become a political liability, being a lightning rod for opponents of global government.                                    1996 — The United Nations 420-page report Our Global Neighborhood is published. It outlines a plan for “global governance,” calling for an international Conference on Global Governance in 1998 for the purpose of submitting to the world the necessary treaties and agreements for ratification by the year 2000.

http://www.constitution.org/col/cuddy_nwo.htm

Posted in News | Print | No Comments »

July 19, 2007 by PT Rothschild.

A SHORT PRIMER ON THE ART OF UPTOWN BULLSHIT
 

When Eve was called before The Lord to answer as why she had disobeyed His instructions regarding the Tree of All Knowledge, her reply was ‘The Serpent beguiled me,’ in other words, I believed what he told me. We, as a human race, cling to that fatal flaw in our make-up. It is how politicians get elected, stay in office, and how lawyers win cases. In an effort to break this ‘spell’ at least for politicians, let me show you, my dear reader, free of charge, how to interpret what a politician is saying to you, really saying to you through the use of ‘wafflespeak’, the art of uptown bullshit.



 Let’s first take a personal favorite of mine, the “I didn’t have sex with that woman.” Since the man saying this famous line was referring to getting a blowjob rather than ‘face time’, it could be argued the woman was the one having sex, since she was the active partner. It was shaving the truth but then that’s what politicians do. I remember one Governor getting elected in Kentucky by saying he was going to do away with the then current sales tax of 2%. After he was elected he ‘kept’ his word by eliminating that tax and replacing it with one for 5%.
But here’s a more recent example. In April, Senator John McCain was asked whether he would stop federal raids on medical marijuana patients in states that had legalized the medicinal use. His reply, “I will let states decide that issue.” This means, I’m not going to commit an answer at this time that would jeopardize future campaign donations. Several days ago when asked if he still supported ending the raids, the answer was this. “Not yet,” he said. “I don’t think marijuana is healthy, I don’t think that it is good for people, and there is a large body of medical opinion that says there is plenty of other medications that are more effective and better and less damaging to one’s health to use to relieve pain. So I will continue to look at it on your behalf and many other young people who feel very strongly about it, but right now my answer to you is no.” Let’s analyze his response.

• Not yet – I can’t be direct, must leave some room for hope.
  
• I don’t think marijuana is healthy – I’ve never had the balls to try it. I’m a goody-two shoes.
  
• I don’t think that it is good for people – I buy into what other people like me think. Their opinion is my opinion. The right is always right.
  
• there is a large body of medical opinion – all the doctors at the labs where they OD lab rats on 20 joints an hour say it’s bad.
  
• there is plenty of other medications – all the big folks at the drug companies are donating to my campaign and I get free samples.
  
• that are more effective and better and less damaging to one’s health to use to relieve pain – I’ve never read any pot report outside of the DEA stats or that didn’t come from the big drug companies.
  
• So I will continue to look at it on your behalf – must reopen the ‘jar of hope’ to this hippie who is asking me the question.
  
• and many other young people who feel very strongly about it – must continue to spread the manure and fertilize the whole lawn.
  
• but right now my answer to you is no – now I can give you my real answer since I sugarcoated it first.
  

This has been a short lecture on how to interpret ‘wafflespeak’. If you have trouble passing this course, I recommend remedial class Poly Sci 101, ‘If Their Lips Are Moving’

Posted in Commentary, News | Print | No Comments »

July 18, 2007 by PT Rothschild.

“WE THE FREE AND WILLING, GOVERNED BY THE UNKNOWING POWERFUL, ARE DOING THE IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE UNGRATEFUL RICH AND RACISTS. WE HAVE DONE SO MUCH FOR SO LONG WITH SO LITTLE APPRECIATION, WE ARE NOW SATISFIED TO DO ANYTHING WITH NOTHING BUT PRAISE FROM GOD.”

Posted in Commentary | Print | No Comments »

July 14, 2007 by PT Rothschild.

THE REVOLUTION WAS TELEVISED SO THE RELIGIOUS STATUS QUO ACCEPTED IT
 

With the official notification that the Scooter Libby Affair is behind us, we as a nation were ordered to move on by our chief executive officer, George Dubya, the revolutionary coup to finish the high-jacking of this great social experiment known as the United States is complete. Rome is now Nero’s and most people never realized it though contrary to the popular maxim, the ‘revolution was televised’. Having the recent memories of the blowback outrage of the entire country resulting from Slick Willy’s infamous love for groupie sex (BJ’s), Cuban made tobacco didoes, and cream stains (‘We all need someone to cream on’ – The Rolling Stones), it seems a different country now, content to be lied to time and time again, with no end in sight, and yet nothing ignites the flame of rebellion. Not the broken promises, not the thousands of lives lost for oil, the disruption of the world in general, or even the arrogance of the latest order to ‘move on’ has caused a much of a stir in the status quo corridors that are mainstream, just a lone vocal outcry here and there, except in the new music scene which is alive with outrage, just listen to the first three tracks of Ryan Mudd’s compilation of demos on SOS Records (www.sosrecords.us ) for example.


Desensitized by and fed lies through TV, the nation has become a camp of ‘sheeple’ divided by fears of immigration and terror, and the logical sensibility of Homer Simpson’s dead-on philosophical retort, “Yeah, but what are you going to do?”, which sums up the fact that the people we trusted to ‘watch our electorial backs’ have become the best politicians money and power can buy. Amazingly enough, when you read the description of these present days in chapters of the Book of Daniel and Revelation, you think ‘how could this happen’ as the ancient words read like a cartoon description of today by simplifying the plotline down to evil. How we got here is like what we used to say when I was an engineer, “When you are up to your ass in alligators, it’s a fine time to remember that your initial job was to drain the swamp.” Living out here in So Cali among all the scene of new music and having a day job, I think I can be forgiven for not getting too worked up over the current state of political affairs. Turning off the tube and listening to live entertainment helps. Besides, I’ve read how this story ends. For the non-religious, the ‘good guys’ win, in the end. Meanwhile, as Chief Wiggam says when his tie gets caught in Apu’s Quickie Mart hotdog machine, “This is going to get worse before it gets better.”
 

“Left hand, right hand, doesn’t matter what party you’re in,
Left hand, right hand, so connected to an evil man,
Left hand, right hand, Democrat, Republican,

Left hand, right hand, all connected to an evil man” – Ryan Mudd & The Stuff
 

Posted in Commentary, News | Print | No Comments »